If there is only one thing that you learn from reading this book, I hope it is this: there is a light within you. This light – if you follow it carefully – will lead you to everything that you need to know to be happy and successful. Please note that I did not say that it would tell you what you need to know. There is a lot of work involved, both in developing the skill to recognize the light and in following its lead. If you follow the light it will lead you to do things that are good for you, but they won’t always be easy or things that make you comfortable. It’s a process. A process that I will explain in more detail in the chapters to come.
Trust the light and trust yourself. It sound deep and mysterious, but it’s also practical. Nobody is perfect, but it’s better to believe in yourself and fix your mistakes while knowing your decisions were your decisions than to turn over your power to choose to someone else.
One of the purposes of this book is to establish a possible, reasonable way of living that will lead you to happiness whether or not you are religious and/or spiritual. I don’t think that a good person who believes in God should be acting any different that a good atheist. True, the religionist will pray more, but (and this is despite the fact that I believe in prayer) I believe that prayer is not nearly as important as being a good person.
I believe in the freedom to choose, whatever I choose, so long as my freedom doesn’t restrict another person’s freedom. Add to this the belief that all people should live by the same code of ethics and you get one my main perspectives in life. Live in a way as to increase freedom for as many people as possible.
Many philosophers do not believe in real freedom of choice. That is, although they concede we make choices, we don’t really have a true choice – it’s an error to think that we could have made another choice under the same circumstances. One argument for this is quite simple – everything is caused by something else. You ate because you were hungry, you were hungry because brain was monitoring your stomach and told it to growl…and so forth. Even if my sequence is somewhat inaccurate, you get the idea.
I believe that we have the freedom to choose, but my argument is based on observation. An argument like this is called a defeasible argument.